HARRY POTTER: HOGWARTS MYSTERY:
Harry Potter: Hogwarts Mystery faced criticism for its energy-based gameplay, where players needed to wait for energy to recharge or purchase it using real money. This mechanic disrupted the flow of the game and led to frustration. Additionally, the heavy reliance on microtransactions and pay-to-win elements created an imbalance between players, detracting from the fairness of the experience. Furthermore, the limited choices and linear storyline failed to deliver the promised immersive role-playing experience, leaving some players feeling underwhelmed.
FORZA STREET:
Forza Street received some criticism from players for a few reasons. Firstly, many fans of the Forza series were disappointed by the significant departure from the traditional racing mechanics and open-world exploration found.
TOM CLANCY'S ELITE SQUAD:
Tom Clancy's Elite Squad faced criticism from players for several reasons. One of the main concerns was its implementation of aggressive microtransactions and a pay-to-win model. Some players felt that the game heavily incentivized spending real money to acquire stronger characters and weapons, creating an unbalanced playing field and diminishing the value of skill and strategy. Additionally, there were complaints about repetitive gameplay and lackluster storytelling, with the game failing to deliver engaging missions or a compelling narrative experience. The game also faced backlash for its inclusion of certain controversial imagery and themes, which led to criticism of its portrayal of real-world events and the use of iconic Tom Clancy characters.
POKÉMON RUMBLE RUSH:
Pokémon Rumble Rush received mixed feedback from players, and here are a few reasons why some people may have expressed dissatisfaction with the game. One of the main criticisms was the repetitive and simplistic gameplay. The combat mechanics were often seen as shallow and lacking depth, leading to a lack of strategic depth or long-term engagement. Another point of contention was the heavy reliance on in-app purchases and a gacha-style system for acquiring new Pokémon. Some players felt that the game pushed too heavily towards microtransactions, creating a pay-to-win environment and making progress feel slow and tedious for those who didn't want to spend real money. Additionally, the slow update cycle and limited content updates left some players feeling bored and uninterested in the long run.
DIABLO IMMORTAL:
Diablo Immortal received significant backlash and criticism from fans for a few key reasons. The primary factor was the disappointment surrounding the game's announcement and subsequent delay, as many fans were eagerly anticipating a new installment in the mainline Diablo series for PC. Instead, Diablo Immortal was announced as a mobile game, which led to frustration and dissatisfaction among long-time fans of the franchise.
Additionally, the monetization model of Diablo Immortal drew criticism. The game featured microtransactions and a free-to-play structure, which raised concerns about pay-to-win mechanics and the potential for an imbalanced gameplay experience. Fans feared that the game's design and progression might heavily favor players who were willing to spend money, creating an unfair advantage.
Furthermore, during its initial announcement, the developers faced backlash from fans due to the perceived tone-deaf response to concerns. The announcement was met with a negative reception, with fans feeling that the developers were out of touch with their audience's expectations and desires for the Diablo franchise.
Overall, Diablo Immortal faced criticism for the shift in platform, concerns over monetization, and the developers' initial response, which collectively led to disappointment and discontent among fans of the series.
NOTE- PHOTOS TAKEN FROM PINTEREST
DATA TAKEN FROM: OPENAI CHATGPT
FOR ANY QUERY AND REMOVE OF CONTENT PLEASE CONTACT US AT:
exogaming18work@gmail.com
-THANKS FOR READING
EXOGAMING18
HERS'S YOUTUBE VIDEO-
0 Comments